The Shotgun by the Bed
R v Hamouth (2023)
Charge: Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (s. 95(1)) Court: Court of Appeal for Ontario Province: Ontario Heard on GUILTY or NOT? CDN: 28 September 2026
The facts
Police obtained a warrant on the strength of information that the Accused's son was in unlawful possession of firearms, and executed it at a residence. They found four loaded firearms. A .357 Magnum revolver was under a pillow on the master bedroom bed. A 12-gauge shotgun stood propped against the wall beside the bed, in plain view. Two more firearms were in an apparently uninhabited basement bedroom. The Accused's identification was in the nightstand next to the bed and his passport was in the bedroom closet. He faced four counts of possessing a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm. He attacked the search warrant, and separately raised an argument about one particular count - the one relating to the shotgun, which was neither a prohibited nor a restricted firearm. The Crown maintained that a loaded shotgun leaning against the bed of a man whose identification sat in the nightstand beside it was possession, plainly proved.
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Terms in this case
Citation: R v Hamouth, 2023 ONCA 518
Read the full decision at coadecisions.ontariocourts.ca. The source reveals the outcome.