Over the Waist-High Fence
R v Le (2019)
Charge: Ten firearm, drug and related offences (Criminal Code; CDSA) Court: Supreme Court of Canada Province: Ontario Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 2 November 2026
The facts
One evening in 2012, five young racialized men, including the 20-year-old Accused, were gathered in the small private backyard of a townhouse at a housing co-operative in Ontario. The yard was enclosed by a waist-high fence. Three police officers arrived without a warrant. They wanted to check whether any of the young men was a wanted suspect or knew where one was, and to look into possible drug dealing linked to the property. Two officers walked into the yard without consent, asked the men what was going on, who they were and whether any of them lived there, and asked for identification. The third officer patrolled the perimeter and then stepped over the fence. One young man was told to keep his hands visible. Asked for identification, the Accused said he had none; he was then asked what was in his satchel. He ran, was chased and arrested, and was found with a loaded handgun, drugs and cash. Was he arbitrarily detained, and if so, should the gun and drugs be excluded?
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Citation: R v Le, 2019 SCC 34
Read the full decision at decisions.scc-csc.ca. The source reveals the outcome.