GUILTY or NOT?CDN version

GUILTY or NOT? CDN / Case library / Firearms & Weapons

The Revolver and the Question

R v Grant (2009)

Charge: Possession of a firearm for the purpose of transferring it (s. 100(1)) Court: Supreme Court of Canada Province: Ontario Heard on GUILTY or NOT? CDN: 20 September 2026

The facts

Police on patrol near Toronto schools stopped a young man on the sidewalk and began questioning him. Asked whether he had anything on him that he should not have, he told the officers he was carrying a firearm and produced a loaded revolver. He was charged with five firearm offences. One of them was possessing the firearm for the purpose of transferring it - a trafficking-style count carrying its own elements. The Crown's theory was that a young man with no licence, carrying a loaded handgun on the street, must have had it in order to move it on to someone else; the Crown also argued that the offence requires no more than an intention to move the firearm from place to place without lawful authority. The Defence said the Crown had proved possession and nothing else: there was no evidence of a buyer, a seller, a price, or any arrangement to hand the gun to anyone.

You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.

Citation: R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32, [2009] 2 SCR 353

Read the full decision at scc-csc.ca. The source reveals the outcome.