The Rifle on the Train
R v Felawka (1993)
Charge: Carrying a concealed weapon (then s. 89(1), now s. 90) Court: Supreme Court of Canada Province: British Columbia Heard on GUILTY or NOT? CDN: 16 September 2026
The facts
The Accused spent the afternoon target shooting and was heading home with his .22 calibre rifle. He boarded a train for the trip back. Not wanting other passengers to be alarmed at the sight of a rifle, he wrapped the gun in his jacket so it would not be seen. He was charged with carrying a concealed weapon. The Crown said the section is straightforward: a firearm is a weapon, he knew it was a firearm, and he deliberately took steps to hide it from the people around him. The Defence said the section was never meant to reach a lawful sport shooter on his way home from a range, that the Accused had no hostile purpose whatsoever, and that covering a rifle so as not to frighten commuters is common courtesy rather than criminal concealment.
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Citation: R v Felawka, [1993] 4 SCR 199, 1993 CanLII 36 (SCC)
Read the full decision at scc-csc.ca. The source reveals the outcome.