The Letters From Inside
R v Cubitt (2024)
Charge: Unauthorized possession (s. 91(1)), possession knowing it unauthorized (s. 92(1)), transferring a firearm (s. 99(2)), possession while prohibited (s. 117.01(1)) Court: Court of Appeal for Ontario Province: Ontario Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 18 October 2026
The facts
The Accused was already in custody on an unrelated charge when firearms charges were laid against him arising from events at a First Nation. The Crown's case was entirely circumstantial. Closed-circuit footage placed him near a library. More damaging were three letters he wrote from prison: in one he directed a man named in the letter to dig up two P-80 firearms buried at a friend's house and to re-bury them elsewhere. The letters also contained references to drug debts. No firearm was ever recovered. He was charged with unauthorized possession, possession knowing the possession unauthorized, transferring a firearm, and possession while subject to a prohibition order. The live issues were whether the buried objects were 'firearms' within the meaning of the Code at all, and whether the Crown had proved a transfer.
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Terms in this case
Citation: R v Cubitt, 2024 ONCA 902
Read the full decision at coadecisions.ontariocourts.ca. The source reveals the outcome.