Just Over Her Head
R v Baptiste (2025)
Charge: Pointing a firearm (s. 87) and recklessly discharging a firearm (s. 244.2(1)) Court: Court of Appeal for British Columbia Province: British Columbia Heard on GUILTY or NOT? CDN: 18 September 2026
The facts
During an altercation with his intimate partner in a bedroom at his father's residence, the Accused pointed a rifle at her. He then raised it slightly and fired a shot just over her head, leaving a hole in the wall behind her. He was charged with eleven offences; the Crown stayed four and proceeded on seven, among them both pointing a firearm and recklessly discharging a firearm arising out of the same moment. The question was whether both firearm counts could stand together. He argued that the rule against multiple convictions for the same delict barred one of them, since raising the rifle and firing it were a single continuous act against a single person. The Crown said the two sections address different harms and that the pointing offence contains an element the discharge offence does not.
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Terms in this case
Citation: R v Baptiste, 2025 BCCA 208
Read the full decision at bccourts.ca. The source reveals the outcome.