For the Lounge
R v Allison (2024)
Charge: Conspiracy to traffic in firearms and offering a restricted firearm for sale (ss. 99/100) Court: Court of Appeal for Ontario Province: Ontario Heard on GUILTY or NOT?: 9 October 2026
- Firearms & Weapons
- Police Powers & the Charter
- Evidence & Identification
- Parties, Conspiracy & Attempts
The facts
A wiretap investigation targeted a group trafficking firearms. The Accused admitted on the stand that the organization trafficked guns and that he had wanted in. He admitted receiving two shipments through a courier - one poor-quality firearm in April 2018, which he had a 'mechanic' repair, and later two more. His defence was that a United States-based trafficker had strung him along, and that every gun he actually received was for his own protection at the lounge he operated, not for resale. The Crown relied on the intercepted communications, expert evidence about the firearms trade, and the Accused's own testimony. Individual intercepts were genuinely ambiguous, and the Accused pointed to that ambiguity as reasonable doubt. The question was whether a man who admits wanting into a gun-trafficking operation, and who takes delivery of firearms and has one repaired, can be believed when he says the guns were only ever for himself.
You have the facts the court had. Did the Crown prove it beyond a reasonable doubt? Render your verdict in the game, then see what the court actually decided — and why.
Terms in this case
Citation: R v Allison, 2024 ONCA 512
Read the full decision at coadecisions.ontariocourts.ca. The source reveals the outcome.