GUILTY or NOT? / Glossary
Canadian legal glossary
Imitation firearm
Something made to resemble a firearm. Several weapons offences expressly reach imitations, so the Crown need not prove the object could fire.
Cases that turn on it
The 3 real Canadian cases in the library whose brief uses this term. Read the facts, then decide — the verdict stays in the game.
-
The Trunk on the Highway
2025
R v Ramdeo — Possession of an imitation firearm for a purpose dangerous to the public peace (s. 88(1)) · Court of Appeal for Ontario
-
Is It Real?
2026
R v Al-Gburi — Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (s. 95(2)), possession knowing it unauthorized (s. 92(3)), possession while prohibited (s. 117.01(3)) · Court of Appeal for Ontario
-
Whose Backpack
2026
Charette c R — Possession offences under ss. 92(1), 94(1), 95(2) and possession of an imitation weapon (s. 88(2)), possession while prohibited (s. 117.01(1)) · Cour d'appel du Québec
Related category: Firearms & Weapons
Possession, careless storage, pointing, discharging and trafficking — the Criminal Code firearm and weapons offences, and what the Crown has to prove about the gun itself. The newest Firearms & Weapons cases in the library:
-
The Bag Under the Seat
2021
Currie v R — Possession of a firearm while prohibited (s. 117.01) and related firearm offences · Court of Appeal of New Brunswick
-
Over the Waist-High Fence
2019
R v Le — Ten firearm, drug and related offences (Criminal Code; CDSA) · Supreme Court of Canada (Ontario)
-
The Backpack in the Alley
2024
R v Sabiston — Firearm offences arising from possession of a loaded sawed-off shotgun · Supreme Court of Canada (Saskatchewan)
-
The Backpack on the Ground
2026
R v McGuinness — Possession of a loaded prohibited firearm (s. 95(1)) · Provincial Court of British Columbia
All 32 Firearms & Weapons cases →
See also: Firearms vocabulary
← hybrid offence · indictable offence → · All 51 terms
A new real Canadian case every day. Read the brief, weigh the Crown against the defence, commit to a verdict, then see what the court decided — and why.