GUILTY or NOT? / Glossary
Canadian legal glossary
Not criminally responsible
A verdict where a mental disorder rendered the accused incapable of appreciating the nature and quality of the act or of knowing it was wrong. It is a verdict, not an acquittal.
Cases that turn on it
The 2 real Canadian cases in the library whose brief uses this term. Read the facts, then decide — the verdict stays in the game.
-
The Carving Knife
2025
R v McCrae — Possession of a weapon for a purpose dangerous to the public peace (s. 88(1)) · Supreme Court of British Columbia
-
Another Planet
2011
R v Bouchard-Lebrun — Aggravated assault (s. 268) and assault (s. 266) · Supreme Court of Canada (Quebec)
Related category: Defences & Mental State
Self-defence, duress, necessity, consent, automatism and not criminally responsible — the cases where the act is admitted and the fight is over whether the law excuses it. The newest Defences & Mental State cases in the library:
-
The Videotaped Complaint
2006
R v Khelawon — Aggravated assault (s. 268) · Supreme Court of Canada (Ontario)
-
The Broken Guitar
2019
R v Ruddick — Aggravated assault (s. 268(1) Criminal Code) · Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
-
The Driver at Gunpoint
1977
Paquette v The Queen — Non-capital murder, as a party under s. 21(2) (then s. 218; now s. 235) · Supreme Court of Canada (Ontario)
-
The Mushrooms and the Stranger's House
2022
R v Brown — Break and enter and committing aggravated assault (ss. 348(1)(b), 268) · Supreme Court of Canada (Alberta)
All 14 Defences & Mental State cases →
See also: Defences
← non-restricted firearm · operability → · All 51 terms
A new real Canadian case every day. Read the brief, weigh the Crown against the defence, commit to a verdict, then see what the court decided — and why.